On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 10:18:20 -0500 John Griessen <j...@ecosensory.com> wrote:
> Does the category low end bother you? Well, I think low-end is not very specific in reality. Does gEDA really belong in the category of EAGLE, or is it much more powerful? Maybe the “low-end” attitude toward gEDA is based on the fact that pcb doesn't support important features for large and complex boards such as - trace length matching, - constraints/routing styles defined at the net level, - pushing/pulling PCB traces and better support for moving parts with traces routed, - ability to select a component on the PCB by clicking it in the schematic view, - back-annotation to schematic from the PCB editor. Just a few things that sound important to me, a novice PCB designer. Regards, Colin _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
