On Saturday, September 03, 2011, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > Hello folks, > > After some time I start bughunting today again. Well, started to start. > ;-) > > I moved in the lost tag from Vlad to this tree and started a stable/1.x > tree (I do not think that we need 3 version numbers). I will cherry pick > some patches from master respectively from the lm tree. This would be: > * c15a10f - Fix bug 2999830: do not report failed chown() on copy. > * 1b0745a - Fix bug 3006812: ensure exif cache is initialized even when all files are unreadable. > > Feel free to populate the stable tree too. >
Hi, I am still trying to make sense of various branches and how to integrate them. Do I understand it correctly that stable/1.x should be used only for bugfixes and all the new development should go to master? I think that my code for stereo images starts to be relatively stable and I want to push it to master. Is it OK? Vladimir ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ Geeqie-devel mailing list Geeqie-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geeqie-devel
