Ok, thank you for the clarifications Chris. I haven't photo-JPEG on VLC (ubuntu 9.04), i will try later with mencoder or imagemagick. ++
Jack Le samedi 15 août 2009 à 19:17 -0400, chris clepper a écrit : > On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Jack <[email protected]> wrote: > So the comportment is the same under GEM ? > > It really depends on the OS and API used to decode the video. > Quicktime has similar performance using either Motion or Photo JPEG, > and ffmpeg treats them equally well in Windows using FFDShow. I don't > know if libquicktime is handling these codecs on Linux or not. > > > But it is better to use Photo-JPEG for scratch video for > example > (sending a float in the second inlet) ? > > Use Photo-JPEG for non-interlaced sources and Motion for interlaced. > Or deinterlace before converting to Photo. > > _______________________________________________ GEM-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
