Oops, this is not imagemagick but ffmpeg ! ++ Jack
Le dimanche 16 août 2009 à 02:17 +0200, Jack a écrit : > Ok, thank you for the clarifications Chris. > I haven't photo-JPEG on VLC (ubuntu 9.04), i will try later with > mencoder or imagemagick. > ++ > > Jack > > > Le samedi 15 août 2009 à 19:17 -0400, chris clepper a écrit : > > On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Jack <[email protected]> wrote: > > So the comportment is the same under GEM ? > > > > It really depends on the OS and API used to decode the video. > > Quicktime has similar performance using either Motion or Photo JPEG, > > and ffmpeg treats them equally well in Windows using FFDShow. I don't > > know if libquicktime is handling these codecs on Linux or not. > > > > > > But it is better to use Photo-JPEG for scratch video for > > example > > (sending a float in the second inlet) ? > > > > Use Photo-JPEG for non-interlaced sources and Motion for interlaced. > > Or deinterlace before converting to Photo. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > GEM-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev _______________________________________________ GEM-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
