IOhannes m zmölnig a écrit :
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
cyrille henry wrote:
yes, because of the new plugin system, dependencies are handled a bit
more gracefully (that is: you won't notice until runtime...whether this
is good or not, is to be found out)
i was taking about the libdts-dev and libsdl1.2-dev problem i had last
week...
because i firmly believe that these are packaging issues of ubuntu.
i understand that.
i did not noticed any packaging issues of ubuntu when compiling gem, so i think
it's a good news, even if you are not concerned about it.
c
mfgqd
IOhannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkvcUrsACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvTYIwCeO+TVy/pdAMZGH4YinwJjM2jY
gegAoIML9baHgVWAU2mVH+sDO4sSntIx
=L14/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
GEM-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
_______________________________________________
GEM-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
