-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/28/2011 03:05 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > Ah, I see. Are there any runtime tests for the Pd version in Gem?
how it that supposed to help? > I'm perfectly happy if you want to use verbose() instead of logpost(). > I didn't use it because I can't remember what level it posts at, there > is something about +4. so you are saying that there is a loglevel between post() and verbose(0)? how come? fgmasdr IOhannes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6EF2YACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvTsAACg4pokdmaPXBlLUeH0Mlx3PK5k NLcAn0rJysYYVnLav2XlpY326XMnNLxl =HvAO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev