ok you're the boss :-) about the pix_set, i had a fill method which doesn't care about the ROI should it ?
+ a -- do it yourself http://antoine.villeret.free.fr http://drii.ensad.fr -- Google lit ce mail... si vous refusez cela, utilisez l'adresse antoine.villeret [at] free.fr pour me contacter 2012/12/11 IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoel...@iem.at>: > On 12/11/2012 19:24, Antoine Villeret wrote: >> >> and what about the opposite ? >> stay in discrete coordinate in the code and add a normalized message ? >> in that way the conversion is done only once (when the ROI is set in >> normalized coord) and not each time we set the data (for pix_set) >> maybe i'm going wrong... > > > i'd rather not. > the way it is now, [pix_roi] is independent of the actual pixes. > i very much like it that way. > > one could provide helper-functions to easily convert a given ROI/pix to > absolute coordinates on the C++ layer, if you care about the programming > overhead. > the computational overhead is small enough. > > > fgmasdr > IOhannes > > > _______________________________________________ > GEM-dev mailing list > GEM-dev@iem.at > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev _______________________________________________ GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev