----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/845/#review1557 -----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it! seems fine to me; just seems semantic. - Ali On 2011-09-06 14:23:38, Steve Reinhardt wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/845/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated 2011-09-06 14:23:38) > > > Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Black, Steve Reinhardt, and > Nathan Binkert. > > > Summary > ------- > > event: minor cleanup > Initialize flags via the Event constructor instead of calling > setFlags() in the body of the derived class's constructor. I > forget exactly why, but this made life easier when implementing > multi-queue support. > > Also rename Event::getFlags() to isFlagSet() to better match > common usage, and get rid of some unused Event methods. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/cpu/o3/commit_impl.hh b3585da1f970 > src/cpu/o3/inst_queue_impl.hh b3585da1f970 > src/cpu/o3/lsq_unit_impl.hh b3585da1f970 > src/dev/etherlink.cc b3585da1f970 > src/mem/ruby/eventqueue/RubyEventQueueNode.hh b3585da1f970 > src/sim/debug.cc b3585da1f970 > src/sim/eventq.hh b3585da1f970 > src/sim/sim_events.cc b3585da1f970 > src/sim/stat_control.cc b3585da1f970 > > Diff: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/845/diff > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Steve > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
