Sounds basically like the right direction.  I suggest using a tuple rather
than a list if you intend it to be read-only, and also to consider having a
class you can instantiate to represent the list members if they get
complicated.  I know there are other places where I've done "if it's a
scalar, that means X, but if it's a list, then it's Y", but in the end I
think that was a bad idea, and if the semantics aren't sort of immediately
obvious then it's better to have a class with methods that can have
descriptive names, and where the internal structure is hidden behind those
methods.

Steve

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Gabriel Michael Black <
[email protected]> wrote:

> How about the indices are a list, and if the type is a scalar it's the
> type, but if it's also a list (of the same length as the index list) then it
> describes the type of each index.
>
> Gabe
>
>
> Quoting Gabe Black <[email protected]>:
>
>  There are a few use cases for composite operands, operands that are
>> built up from the value of several registers. For instance, double
>> precision floats built from two single precision registers, and a
>> control + condition code register where the control bits and the
>> condition codes are tracked separately.
>>
>> What should the syntax be for telling the isa_parser about these? My
>> initial thought is a python list of expressions that generate each
>> index. Then the read/write code would refer to a range of the source or
>> dest index array using the normal register index value as the starting
>> point. This doesn't handle the second case above where the two registers
>> may be different types.
>>
>> Gabe
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> gem5-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://m5sim.org/mailman/**listinfo/gem5-dev<http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev>
>>
>>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> gem5-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/mailman/**listinfo/gem5-dev<http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev>
>
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to