-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1273/#review2954
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/cpu/testers/rubytest/RubyTester.cc
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1273/#comment3179>

    Why this change? read_idx is an index, and not a Port ID.



src/mem/port.hh
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1273/#comment3180>

    Should we have a virtual function for port binding here in the 
BaseSlavePort class as well?


- Nilay Vaish


On June 17, 2012, 10:18 a.m., Andreas Hansson wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1273/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 17, 2012, 10:18 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 9081:944fe8294fa3
> ---------------------------
> Port: Add protocol-agnostic ports in the port hierarchy
> 
> This patch adds an additional level of ports in the inheritance
> hierarchy, separating out the protocol-specific and protocl-agnostic
> parts. All the functionality related to the binding of ports is now
> confined to use BaseMaster/BaseSlavePorts, and all the
> protocol-specific parts stay in the Master/SlavePort. In the future it
> will be possible to add other protocol-specific implementations.
> 
> The functions used in the binding of ports, i.e. getMaster/SlavePort
> now use the base classes, and the index parameter is updated to use
> the PortID typedef with the symbolic InvalidPortID as the default.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/arch/arm/table_walker.hh fa77985a87c6 
>   src/arch/arm/table_walker.cc fa77985a87c6 
>   src/arch/arm/tlb.hh fa77985a87c6 
>   src/arch/arm/tlb.cc fa77985a87c6 
>   src/arch/x86/interrupts.hh fa77985a87c6 
>   src/arch/x86/pagetable_walker.hh fa77985a87c6 
>   src/arch/x86/pagetable_walker.cc fa77985a87c6 
>   src/arch/x86/tlb.hh fa77985a87c6 
>   src/arch/x86/tlb.cc fa77985a87c6 
>   src/cpu/base.hh fa77985a87c6 
>   src/cpu/base.cc fa77985a87c6 
>   src/cpu/testers/directedtest/RubyDirectedTester.hh fa77985a87c6 
>   src/cpu/testers/directedtest/RubyDirectedTester.cc fa77985a87c6 
>   src/cpu/testers/memtest/memtest.hh fa77985a87c6 
>   src/cpu/testers/memtest/memtest.cc fa77985a87c6 
>   src/cpu/testers/networktest/networktest.hh fa77985a87c6 
>   src/cpu/testers/networktest/networktest.cc fa77985a87c6 
>   src/cpu/testers/rubytest/RubyTester.hh fa77985a87c6 
>   src/cpu/testers/rubytest/RubyTester.cc fa77985a87c6 
>   src/dev/copy_engine.hh fa77985a87c6 
>   src/dev/copy_engine.cc fa77985a87c6 
>   src/dev/dma_device.hh fa77985a87c6 
>   src/dev/dma_device.cc fa77985a87c6 
>   src/dev/io_device.hh fa77985a87c6 
>   src/dev/io_device.cc fa77985a87c6 
>   src/dev/pcidev.hh fa77985a87c6 
>   src/dev/x86/i82094aa.hh fa77985a87c6 
>   src/mem/bridge.hh fa77985a87c6 
>   src/mem/bridge.cc fa77985a87c6 
>   src/mem/bus.hh fa77985a87c6 
>   src/mem/bus.cc fa77985a87c6 
>   src/mem/cache/base.hh fa77985a87c6 
>   src/mem/cache/base.cc fa77985a87c6 
>   src/mem/comm_monitor.hh fa77985a87c6 
>   src/mem/comm_monitor.cc fa77985a87c6 
>   src/mem/mem_object.hh fa77985a87c6 
>   src/mem/mem_object.cc fa77985a87c6 
>   src/mem/port.hh fa77985a87c6 
>   src/mem/port.cc fa77985a87c6 
>   src/mem/ruby/system/RubyPort.hh fa77985a87c6 
>   src/mem/ruby/system/RubyPort.cc fa77985a87c6 
>   src/mem/simple_mem.hh fa77985a87c6 
>   src/mem/simple_mem.cc fa77985a87c6 
>   src/python/swig/pyobject.cc fa77985a87c6 
>   src/sim/system.hh fa77985a87c6 
>   src/sim/system.cc fa77985a87c6 
>   src/sim/tlb.hh fa77985a87c6 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1273/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> util/regress all passing (disregarding t1000 and eio)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andreas Hansson
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to