On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 8:31 AM, nathan binkert <[email protected]> wrote:

> > If ClockedObjects also had a list of children,
> > then we could traverse the tree of clocked objects any time a clock
> > period was changed and thus be able to deal with DVFS (and the general
> > notion of clock domains) more easily.


So you're saying we need a "clock tree"?  Sounds oddly familiar...

Seriously, sounds like a good idea too.

Steve
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to