We're a good bit on the way there using the approach I just alluded to. Andreas
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Reinhardt Sent: 14 September 2012 16:45 To: gem5 Developer List Subject: Re: [gem5-dev] Deferred Python parameter resolution for CPU clock On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 8:31 AM, nathan binkert <[email protected]> wrote: > > If ClockedObjects also had a list of children, > > then we could traverse the tree of clocked objects any time a clock > > period was changed and thus be able to deal with DVFS (and the general > > notion of clock domains) more easily. So you're saying we need a "clock tree"? Sounds oddly familiar... Seriously, sounds like a good idea too. Steve _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
