> On Oct. 23, 2012, 1:29 p.m., Andreas Hansson wrote:
> >
> 
> Lluís Vilanova wrote:
>     But isn't that the same thing that's happening with associativity and 
> size for that same example? For example, the associativity settings for 
> "O3_ARM_v7a_ICache" are being overridden by "options.l1i_assoc" in 
> "CacheConfig.py".

Somehow we should fix that as well, imho :)

Afraid I cannot suggest an easy solution at this point. Any ideas?


- Andreas


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1454/#review3586
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Oct. 23, 2012, 11:18 a.m., Lluís Vilanova wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1454/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 23, 2012, 11:18 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Simplifies initial testing of different cache latency values with the example 
> scripts.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   configs/common/CacheConfig.py f634a34f2f0b 
>   configs/common/Options.py f634a34f2f0b 
>   configs/ruby/MESI_CMP_directory.py f634a34f2f0b 
>   configs/ruby/MI_example.py f634a34f2f0b 
>   configs/ruby/MOESI_CMP_directory.py f634a34f2f0b 
>   configs/ruby/MOESI_CMP_token.py f634a34f2f0b 
>   configs/ruby/MOESI_hammer.py f634a34f2f0b 
>   configs/ruby/Network_test.py f634a34f2f0b 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1454/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Lluís Vilanova
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to