> On April 8, 2013, 8:12 a.m., Andreas Hansson wrote:
> > src/mem/ruby/system/Sequencer.cc, line 568
> > <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1814/diff/1/?file=34763#file34763line568>
> >
> >     Should the same not apply here?

During cooldown, the CacheRecorder injects MemCmd::FlushReq packets, which do 
not require responses.  Thus, the packet deconstructor *should* delete the 
request when this delete is called.  I just ran a small test to verify, and 
that assessment appears correct.


- Joel


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1814/#review4215
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 7, 2013, 8:48 p.m., Joel Hestness wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1814/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 7, 2013, 8:48 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 9631:910e75681f78
> ---------------------------
> Sequencer: Delete packet requests during warmup
> 
> When warming up caches in Ruby, the CacheRecorder sends fetch requests into
> Ruby Sequencers with packet types that require responses. Since responses are
> never generated for these CacheRecorder requests, the requests are not deleted
> in the packet destructor called from the Ruby hit callback. Free the request.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/mem/ruby/system/Sequencer.cc fa31189e1fb5 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1814/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tested with Valgrind to ensure that memory leaks are fixed.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joel Hestness
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to