> On Sept. 21, 2013, 8:39 a.m., Andreas Hansson wrote:
> > src/sim/eventq_impl.hh, line 55
> > <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1667/diff/9/?file=37731#file37731line55>
> >
> >     is it worth checking inParallelMode first?
> >     
> >     As a side not, do we know what the performance impact is when not 
> > running in parallel mode? (perhaps this has been resolved already)
> 
> Nilay Vaish wrote:
>     I'll run the regression tests and report the execution time differences 
> soon.
> 
> Andreas Hansson wrote:
>     My _very_ early results suggest around -15% host_inst_rate for most of 
> the regressions, but I'll get back to you tomorrow with a more conclusive 
> result.
> 
> Andreas Hansson wrote:
>     Ok, so a full regression run, including compilation of all ISAs is now 
> 18% slower. This is a fairly accurate measure of the slowdown, as the run 
> time is within +-10 min over the last months.
>     
>     This suggests actual simulation is more than 18% slower, which obviously 
> is a _big_ issue. I haven't done any profiling, but will keep you posted on 
> any findings.

That is painful.  I hope that we can identify the source of the overhead and 
solve it with (at worst) some special-casing on (numEventQueues == 1) that 
isn't too intrusive or ugly.

Thanks for thinking of this... it didn't even occur to me to check.


- Steve


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1667/#review4727
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 21, 2013, 11:36 a.m., Nilay Vaish wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1667/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 21, 2013, 11:36 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 9885:ab020183761b
> ---------------------------
> sim: simulate with multiple event queues
> This patch extends the patch Steve posted on the reviewboard (846). The patch
> updated with all the changes that have taken place over last 15 months. Code
> has been added so as actually carry out a quantum-based parallel simulation.
> 
> The patch was tested in two different configurations:
> 1. ruby_network_test.py: in this simulation L1 cache controllers receive
>    requests from the cpu. The requests are replied to immediately without
>    any communication taking place with any other level.
> 2. twosys-tsunami-simple-atomic: this configuration simulates a client-server
>    system which are connected by an ethernet link.
> 
> We still lack the ability to communicate using message buffers or ports. But
> other things like simulation start and end, synchronizing after every quantum
> seem to be working.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/SConscript 372d3611c693 
>   src/base/barrier.hh PRE-CREATION 
>   src/cpu/base.cc 372d3611c693 
>   src/dev/etherlink.cc 372d3611c693 
>   src/python/m5/SimObject.py 372d3611c693 
>   src/python/m5/event.py 372d3611c693 
>   src/python/m5/main.py 372d3611c693 
>   src/python/m5/simulate.py 372d3611c693 
>   src/python/swig/event.i 372d3611c693 
>   src/sim/Root.py 372d3611c693 
>   src/sim/SConscript 372d3611c693 
>   src/sim/core.hh 372d3611c693 
>   src/sim/core.cc 372d3611c693 
>   src/sim/debug.cc 372d3611c693 
>   src/sim/eventq.hh 372d3611c693 
>   src/sim/eventq.cc 372d3611c693 
>   src/sim/eventq_impl.hh 372d3611c693 
>   src/sim/global_event.hh PRE-CREATION 
>   src/sim/global_event.cc PRE-CREATION 
>   src/sim/root.cc 372d3611c693 
>   src/sim/serialize.hh 372d3611c693 
>   src/sim/serialize.cc 372d3611c693 
>   src/sim/sim_events.hh 372d3611c693 
>   src/sim/sim_events.cc 372d3611c693 
>   src/sim/sim_exit.hh 372d3611c693 
>   src/sim/sim_object.cc 372d3611c693 
>   src/sim/simulate.hh 372d3611c693 
>   src/sim/simulate.cc 372d3611c693 
>   src/sim/stat_control.cc 372d3611c693 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1667/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Nilay Vaish
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to