Hi Nilay,

Unfortunately I haven't found the time to dig into this yet.

I only have the output from last nights regression, and thus not with and
without your patch. I'll take a snapshot and compare, although I suspect
the individual runs vary quite a bit.

Have you attempted any further profiling?

Andreas


On 08/10/2013 18:32, "Nilay Vaish" <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Wed, 25 Sep 2013, Andreas Hansson wrote:
>
>> Hi Nilay,
>>
>> I'm afraid I won't have time to do that until next week sometime.
>>
>> In the meanwhile I have re-verified that the regressions are indeed
>> getting 19% slower (by disabling your patch again). ~13hr with and ~11hr
>> without.
>>
>
>
>Andreas, were you able to find time to figure out which regression tests
>are affected by this change? You just need to grep for host_seconds on
>the
>output from two runs.
>
>--
>Nilay
>
>


-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are 
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any 
other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any 
medium.  Thank you.

ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered 
in England & Wales, Company No:  2557590
ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, 
Registered in England & Wales, Company No:  2548782

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to