-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2152/#review4900
-----------------------------------------------------------


I'll go ahead with this one unless someone minds (since it solves an actual 
user issue).

- Andreas Hansson


On Jan. 23, 2014, 8:23 a.m., Andreas Hansson wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2152/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 23, 2014, 8:23 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 10022:760e983b77ee
> ---------------------------
> mem: Filter cache snoops based on address ranges
> 
> This patch adds a filter to the cache to drop snoop requests that are
> not for a range covered by the cache. This fixes an issue observed
> when multiple caches are placed in parallel, covering different
> address ranges. Without this patch, all the caches will forward the
> snoop upwards, when only one should do so.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/mem/cache/cache_impl.hh a362694dda2d 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2152/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> All regressions pass
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andreas Hansson
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to