Hi Adrian,

Sorry for missing your first email. I have solved the interchanged segment 
limits and other bits in segment descriptors for full system mode, though I get 
a different behavior on my system. The simulation seems to hang in the 
following manner:

Processor #0 (Bootup-CPU)
I/O APIC #1 at 0xFEC00000.
Setting APIC routing to flat
Processors: 1
PANIC: early exception rip ffffffff807909a9 error 9 cr2 ffffffffff5fd020

Can you please provide a patch with all the modifications that fixed the issue 
on your system?

Thank you,
Alex

-----Original Message-----
From: gem5-dev [mailto:gem5-dev-boun...@gem5.org] On Behalf Of mike upton via 
gem5-dev
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 11:52 AM
To: gem5 Developer List
Subject: Re: [gem5-dev] x86 SE kvm functionality (AMD vs Intel)

Will someone be providing a patch for this? I am happy to test it.
From Adrian's description it seems there are a bunch of issues.



On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Adrián Colaso Diego via gem5-dev < 
gem5-dev@gem5.org> wrote:

> You are right Nilay. I sent an email last week but nobody has replied.
>
> It seems that descriptors (cdDesc, dsDesc and tssDesc) located in 
> src/arch/x86/system.cc file are not well-initialized and as a 
> consequence kvm does not work when running in full-system mode.
>
> Segment limits values (limitHigh and limitLow) are interchanged and 
> several segment descriptor values are wrong too. If these values are 
> corrected kvm works again as before.
>
> Adrian
>
> El lun, 08-12-2014 a las 22:50 -0600, Nilay Vaish via gem5-dev escribió:
> > I also faced problem in getting KVM CPU to run in FS mode.  I 
> > figured
> that
> > the following changeset causes problems:
> >
> > author        Alexandru Dutu <alexandru.d...@amd.com>
> >       Sun Nov 23 18:01:08 2014 -0800 (2 weeks ago)
> > changeset 10554       fe2e2f06a7c8
> >
> > I saw the hardware reason 0x80000021, but did not try to figure what 
> > was going on wrong.
> >
> > --
> > Nilay
> >
> > On Mon, 8 Dec 2014, Gabe Black via gem5-dev wrote:
> >
> > > I'm pretty sure entering 64 bit mode is the same between AMD and 
> > > Intel CPUs. I vaguely remember there being some subtle page table 
> > > difference though, and gem5 is building the page tables in SE mode 
> > > instead of the kernel.
> > >
> > > Gabe
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Dutu, Alexandru via gem5-dev < 
> > > gem5-dev@gem5.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Mike,
> > >>
> > >> trace-cmd is a very handy tool to get an overview of what the kvm
> kernel
> > >> module is doing before going into gdb. In extreme cases ftrace 
> > >> can be useful as well.
> > >> What is the error that you are seeing? Is it still failing to 
> > >> enter virtualized mode?
> > >>
> > >> If that is the case and the hardware reason is 0x80000021, that 
> > >> seems
> to
> > >> be an unrecoverable exception (drivers/hv/hyperv_vmbus.h in linux
> kernel
> > >> source code). When running in SE mode, we are trying to bring the
> machine
> > >> state to full 64bit mode without going through legacy modes. It 
> > >> might
> be
> > >> that Intel machines have a different way of going to 64bit mode 
> > >> than
> AMD
> > >> machines (different CR4, different way of enabling 64bit mode 
> > >> page
> tables
> > >> etc.). I remember dealing with these issue for AMD platforms by 
> > >> going through System Programming manual and making sure gem5 gets 
> > >> all the
> bits
> > >> right as there is not much the KVM kernel model will tell about 
> > >> the
> cause
> > >> of failure.
> > >>
> > >> Best regards,
> > >> Alex
> > >> ________________________________________
> > >> From: gem5-dev [gem5-dev-boun...@gem5.org] on behalf of Gabe 
> > >> Black
> via
> > >> gem5-dev [gem5-dev@gem5.org]
> > >> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 7:08 PM
> > >> To: gem5 Developer List
> > >> Subject: Re: [gem5-dev] x86 SE kvm functionality (AMD vs Intel)
> > >>
> > >> I'm not an expert either, but I did have problems running KVM in 
> > >> SE
> mode on
> > >> an Intel CPU. I didn't look into it that much, but I think things
> failed in
> > >> the kernel somewhere. What might be happening is that the 
> > >> different
> vendors
> > >> hardware virtualization mechanisms are more or less picky about
> various
> > >> things. Something might be set up incorrectly, and one 
> > >> implementation
> gets
> > >> more upset about it than the other. I believe there are tools 
> > >> which
> will
> > >> help you determine whether your VM state is legal. Perhaps 
> > >> Andreas
> can tell
> > >> you more about those?
> > >>
> > >> Gabe
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:29 PM, mike upton via gem5-dev <
> gem5-dev@gem5.org
> > >>>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I have verified that x86 kvm works fine on AMD platforms, but 
> > >>> fails
> on
> > >>> Intel platforms.
> > >>>
> > >>> Any hints about how to narrow down the cause (other than diving 
> > >>> into
> gdb,
> > >>> which I will do).
> > >>>
> > >>> I am not an expert in KVM or how gem5 hooks up to libkvm.
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> gem5-dev mailing list
> > >>> gem5-dev@gem5.org
> > >>> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
> > >>>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> gem5-dev mailing list
> > >> gem5-dev@gem5.org
> > >> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> gem5-dev mailing list
> > >> gem5-dev@gem5.org
> > >> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
> > >>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > gem5-dev mailing list
> > > gem5-dev@gem5.org
> > > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gem5-dev mailing list
> > gem5-dev@gem5.org
> > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gem5-dev mailing list
> gem5-dev@gem5.org
> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
>
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
gem5-dev@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
gem5-dev@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to