it is: hg qpush
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Amit Gaikwad <avlan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Mike, > > Thank you so much for taking out time to explain things. That was really > helpful. > > But I have unsuccessful in getting KVM CPU working on my intel system. > Since when I applied the patch , I get the below message : > > agaikwad@AV-LT265-Ubuntu:~/gem5$ hg push > pushing to http://repo.gem5.org/gem5 > <https://webmail.marvell.com/owa/redir.aspx?C=7kHh3BI30EWKYrd52tzdPzqwbQs_BdJI6sDR1ZkS-xkApK2CZS1nNch0WEYzVFsbPFWXO1zihD4.&URL=http%3a%2f%2frepo.gem5.org%2fgem5> > searching for changes > no changes found > > Can you please let me know if you got the same error message ? So may be I > have the recent gem5 which includes this patch ? > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 4:53 PM, mike upton <michaelup...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> if you go here: >> >> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2557/ >> >> there is a 'Download Diff' button on the first active line of the review >> (about 3 down from the 'Review board 1.7.9') >> >> You download it, and then apply it using the method I PMed you. >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Amit Gaikwad <avlan...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: >>> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2557/ >>> >>> On December 10th, 2014, 10:30 p.m. UTC, *mike upton* wrote: >>> >>> There is some issue with AMD platforms. A test that used to run in 30 sec >>> is not finishing. >>> >>> >>> On December 10th, 2014, 10:32 p.m. UTC, *mike upton* wrote: >>> >>> hello world passes. SPEC apps hang. >>> >>> On December 10th, 2014, 10:41 p.m. UTC, *Gabe Black* wrote: >>> >>> Can you identify where it's getting stuck? It could be there's something >>> wrong with how exception handling is set up, and it gets stuck faulting >>> over and over when a page fault happens, for instance. You could have the >>> KVM CPU print what the IP is each time it regains control and see if they >>> cluster somewhere interesting. >>> >>> On December 11th, 2014, 8:12 a.m. UTC, *Gabe Black* wrote: >>> >>> Any luck? Unfortunately the time I have to work on gem5 is pretty limited, >>> so I probably won't be able to dig into this for a while. >>> >>> On January 5th, 2015, 11:12 p.m. UTC, *mike upton* wrote: >>> >>> on the intel platform, with the test input set, all of cpu2006 integer >>> tests pass, except for astar. >>> astar dies with a panic and page fault. >>> [m5PageFault:build/X86/arch/x86/pseudo_inst.cc, line 85] >>> >>> on the amd platform, all of the tests I tried fail to complete. >>> time continues to advance, but instructions are not completing. >>> >>> I am not sure what to do, I need the Intel platform code, but we should not >>> break the AMD side. >>> >>> Are there any AMD folks I can work with to figure out how to get both sides >>> working? >>> >>> >>> On January 6th, 2015, 6:39 p.m. UTC, *Alexandru Dutu* wrote: >>> >>> Sorry about the late reply, I remember replying on a different mailing list >>> thread about this. I have tried this patch on my AMD system with some short >>> running applications and things worked fine. So, I will run cpu2006 and see >>> if there are any issues. >>> >>> On January 11th, 2015, 8:48 a.m. UTC, *Alexandru Dutu* wrote: >>> >>> When running SPEC CPU2006 with latest gem5 on a 6 core Bulldozer, Ubuntu >>> 14.04, linux 3.13.0-34, most of them call exit_group syscall except gromacs >>> which fails because of unimplemented clock_gettime syscall. This means they >>> ran until completion, however I have not yet checked if the output is >>> actually correct. >>> >>> However, after applying this patch things break and there are unexpected >>> exits in the middle of the execution. Looking more into it and coming up >>> with more details. >>> >>> On January 15th, 2015, 5:27 p.m. UTC, *Amit Gaikwad* wrote: >>> >>> I am new to gem5. Can someone please let me know where can I find the >>> wip.patch and also what will be command for patching gem5 ? >>> >>> On January 15th, 2015, 10:55 p.m. UTC, *mike upton* wrote: >>> >>> I am also having trouble running this patch on a different intel x86 system. >>> It looks like there are both segmentation changes, and KVM changes merged >>> together. >>> >>> Can we split it into 2 separate patches? >>> >>> I think some of the style cleanup in the segmentation stuff changed the >>> behavior. >>> >>> If no one else does it, I will attempt a separate minimal patch that just >>> fixes the KVM stuff. >>> >>> @ Mike Upton, >>> >>> I am not even able to find the patch and I am actively looking for it. >>> Did you manually change the below 6 files ? Can you please let me know ? >>> >>> src/arch/x86/process.cc: 8 changes >>> src/arch/x86/system.hh: 1 change >>> src/arch/x86/system.cc: 3 changes >>> src/arch/x86/utility.hh: 2 changes >>> src/arch/x86/utility.cc: 1 change >>> src/cpu/kvm/x86_cpu.cc: 2 changes >>> >>> The changes listed on this link : http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2557/diff/1-2/ >>> >>> >>> >>> - Amit >>> >>> On December 10th, 2014, 10:11 a.m. UTC, Gabe Black wrote: >>> Review request for Default. >>> By Gabe Black. >>> >>> *Updated Dec. 10, 2014, 10:11 a.m.* >>> *Repository: * gem5 >>> Description >>> >>> Changeset 10606:aa3eb7453246 >>> --------------------------- >>> x86: kvm: Fix the KVM CPU in SE and FS on Intel CPUs. >>> >>> There were a number of problems with how things were initialized which >>> prevent >>> VMX from running the simulation as a guest. >>> >>> Diffs >>> >>> - src/arch/x86/process.cc (8fc6e7a835d1d313e139c9095251105f904ac1b4) >>> - src/arch/x86/regs/misc.hh >>> (8fc6e7a835d1d313e139c9095251105f904ac1b4) >>> - src/arch/x86/system.hh (8fc6e7a835d1d313e139c9095251105f904ac1b4) >>> - src/arch/x86/system.cc (8fc6e7a835d1d313e139c9095251105f904ac1b4) >>> - src/arch/x86/utility.hh (8fc6e7a835d1d313e139c9095251105f904ac1b4) >>> - src/arch/x86/utility.cc (8fc6e7a835d1d313e139c9095251105f904ac1b4) >>> - src/cpu/kvm/x86_cpu.cc (8fc6e7a835d1d313e139c9095251105f904ac1b4) >>> >>> View Diff <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2557/diff/> >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
