-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2636/#review5849
-----------------------------------------------------------


It think there are more (and bigger issues) at play here. I'd suggest to try 
this out with: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2626/

If you run it with "-p", prefetches enabled, it doesn't take many seconds 
before it hits an assert. We're working on fixing it, and #2626 is a step on 
the way.

- Andreas Hansson


On Feb. 6, 2015, 12:38 a.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2636/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 6, 2015, 12:38 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 10683:3147f3a868f7
> ---------------------------
> mem: fix prefetcher bug regarding write buffer hits
> 
> Prefetches are supposed to be squashed if the block is already
> present in a higher-level cache.  We squash appropriately if
> the block is in a higher-level cache or MSHR, but did not
> properly handle the case where the block is in the write buffer.
> 
> Thanks to George Michelogiannakis <[email protected]> for
> help in tracking down and testing this fix.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/mem/cache/cache_impl.hh 3d17366c0423a59478ae63d40c8feeea34df218a 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2636/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Steve Reinhardt
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to