Hi Marcus, I’d also say this would be a great topic for the User Workshop at ISCA: http://www.gem5.org/User_workshop_2015
Andreas On 03/03/2015 15:14, "Ali Saidi via gem5-dev" <gem5-dev@gem5.org> wrote: >Hi Marcus, > >Option 1 is probably the most preferred route as the code is much more >likely to say in-sync and compatible if it¹s in the same repository and >tested along side gem5. The best way to proceed with that option is to >post your patches to the gem5 review board http://reviews.gem5.org. If >you¹re using mercurial this can be done with the post-review plugin to >gem5. Take a look at: http://www.gem5.org/Commit_Access > >Thanks for doing this, I think it would be a great help to new users! > >Ali > > >On 3/3/15, 9:07 AM, "Marcus Johnson via gem5-dev" <gem5-dev@gem5.org> >wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>I am a senior at Colorado State University working with two other >>students >>under Dr. Sudeep Pasricha on a senior design project. We have created a >>GUI to aid in configuring gem5 simulations. >> >>It currently supports a variety of command line options which are >>supplied >>to the se.py and fs.py scripts. We are beginning to implement some >>exploration functionality, so that on any particular parameter, a user >>could specify multiple options for which a simulation would run for each. >> >>One of the most important advantages this GUI brings is a reduction to >>the >>learning curve to using gem5, as well as a huge aid in debugging >>configuration options. It has many simple error checks to prevent simple >>mistakes. >> >>We would like to contribute this project open-source to the gem5 >>community, >>and wanted to see what your thoughts are on integrating it with gem5. We >>believe there are two different routes we can take: >> >>Option 1 would be to push our code to the gem5 repository. If this is an >>acceptable option, what is a good way to proceed with this? >> >>Option 2 would be to have our code run completely independent of gem5 >>(the >>user would specify as an option where they have downloaded gem5 code, or >>we >>release it as a patch for gem5). If this were the case, is there a good >>way for us to market this to the gem5 community? >> >>What are your thoughts on the above two options? >> >>Thanks, >>Marcus Johnson >>_______________________________________________ >>gem5-dev mailing list >>gem5-dev@gem5.org >>http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev >> > > >-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are >confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended >recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the >contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy >the information in any medium. Thank you. > >ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, >Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 >ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, >Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782 > >_______________________________________________ >gem5-dev mailing list >gem5-dev@gem5.org >http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev > -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782 _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
