> On April 1, 2015, 6:30 p.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
> > src/mem/cache/tags/base_set_assoc.cc, line 202
> > <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2711/diff/1/?file=44369#file44369line202>
> >
> >     do we really want to replace the visitor pattern with this?  I don't 
> > know how often this is used, but building this whole list seems like 
> > unnecessary overhead.  I guess what we really need is the C++ equivalent of 
> > python generators...

It is only used as part of flushing and checkpointing so it should not be a 
performance issue. Perhaps leave it as is for now?


> On April 1, 2015, 6:30 p.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
> > src/mem/cache/cache_impl.hh, line 1349
> > <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2711/diff/1/?file=44366#file44366line1349>
> >
> >     is 'this->' necessary?

Yes


- Andreas


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2711/#review6008
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 30, 2015, 9:16 a.m., Andreas Hansson wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2711/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 30, 2015, 9:16 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 10777:9f23af363f48
> ---------------------------
> mem: Remove templates in cache model
> 
> This patch changes the cache implementation to rely on virtual methods
> rather than using the replacement policy as a template argument.
> 
> There is no impact on the simulation performance, and overall the
> changes make it easier to modify (and subclass) the cache and/or
> replacement policy.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/mem/cache/base.cc 8a7285d6197e 
>   src/mem/cache/blk.hh 8a7285d6197e 
>   src/mem/cache/cache.hh 8a7285d6197e 
>   src/mem/cache/cache.cc 8a7285d6197e 
>   src/mem/cache/cache_impl.hh 8a7285d6197e 
>   src/mem/cache/tags/base.hh 8a7285d6197e 
>   src/mem/cache/tags/base_set_assoc.hh 8a7285d6197e 
>   src/mem/cache/tags/base_set_assoc.cc 8a7285d6197e 
>   src/mem/cache/tags/fa_lru.hh 8a7285d6197e 
>   src/mem/cache/tags/lru.hh 8a7285d6197e 
>   src/mem/cache/tags/lru.cc 8a7285d6197e 
>   src/mem/cache/tags/fa_lru.cc 8a7285d6197e 
>   src/mem/cache/tags/random_repl.cc 8a7285d6197e 
>   src/mem/cache/tags/random_repl.hh 8a7285d6197e 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2711/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andreas Hansson
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to