> On April 29, 2015, 4:59 p.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
> > src/mem/cache/blk.hh, line 424
> > <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2711/diff/3/?file=44635#file44635line424>
> >
> >     I don't think this needs to be a template anymore, does it?  It's only 
> > instantiated once with <Cache> as the parameter.  I suggest getting rid of 
> > the template and also the WrappedBlkVisitor typedef below. The new class 
> > could use either name.

Not possible since the block cannot include the Cache. The template parameter 
is really just there to break the circular dependency.


> On April 29, 2015, 4:59 p.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
> > src/mem/cache/blk.hh, line 427
> > <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2711/diff/3/?file=44635#file44635line427>
> >
> >     should be VisitorPtr

Will fix.


- Andreas


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2711/#review6095
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 23, 2015, 9:36 a.m., Andreas Hansson wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2711/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 23, 2015, 9:36 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 10802:5f762fe388b5
> ---------------------------
> mem: Remove templates in cache model
> 
> This patch changes the cache implementation to rely on virtual methods
> rather than using the replacement policy as a template argument.
> 
> There is no impact on the simulation performance, and overall the
> changes make it easier to modify (and subclass) the cache and/or
> replacement policy.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/mem/cache/tags/fa_lru.hh 74e3c7359393 
>   src/mem/cache/tags/fa_lru.cc 74e3c7359393 
>   src/mem/cache/tags/lru.hh 74e3c7359393 
>   src/mem/cache/tags/lru.cc 74e3c7359393 
>   src/mem/cache/tags/random_repl.hh 74e3c7359393 
>   src/mem/cache/tags/random_repl.cc 74e3c7359393 
>   src/mem/cache/tags/base_set_assoc.cc 74e3c7359393 
>   src/mem/cache/cache.cc 74e3c7359393 
>   src/mem/cache/cache_impl.hh 74e3c7359393 
>   src/mem/cache/tags/base.hh 74e3c7359393 
>   src/mem/cache/tags/base_set_assoc.hh 74e3c7359393 
>   src/mem/cache/base.cc 74e3c7359393 
>   src/mem/cache/blk.hh 74e3c7359393 
>   src/mem/cache/cache.hh 74e3c7359393 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2711/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andreas Hansson
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to