-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2691/#review8197
-----------------------------------------------------------


Can you please update it?
It neither applies cleanly nor does it compile afterwards.

- Bjoern A. Zeeb


On Jan. 19, 2016, 3:46 a.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2691/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 19, 2016, 3:46 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 10745:9b84d1b570e3
> ---------------------------
> mem: implement x86 locked accesses in timing-mode classic cache
> 
> Add LockedRMW(Read|Write)(Req|Resp) commands.  In timing mode,
> use a combination of clearing permission bits and leaving
> an MSHR in place to prevent accesses & snoops from touching
> a locked block between the read and write parts of an locked
> RMW sequence.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/mem/packet.cc d06e5a6b4b7f05a642c3e2bee12cfeb130dede16 
>   src/mem/cache/cache.cc d06e5a6b4b7f05a642c3e2bee12cfeb130dede16 
>   src/mem/cache/mshr.hh d06e5a6b4b7f05a642c3e2bee12cfeb130dede16 
>   src/mem/packet.hh d06e5a6b4b7f05a642c3e2bee12cfeb130dede16 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2691/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Steve Reinhardt
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
gem5-dev@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to