> I'm not sure any of that fully explains why we have both attributes > though. It is important to remember as in the cache builder example > that the 'type' is really something that identifies the function that > creates the C++ object and isn't necessarily the type of the resulting > object (or even a c++ type at all)... but in those cases there is no > single c++ type, so there still isn't any point in having two > different attributes. We don't need it, it was just an ugly byproduct of the evolution of this code. I needs to be cleaned up for sure.
> That's what I meant by "java directory hierarchy method" (since Gabe > made that analogy). I think it's the best way if we want namespaces. Nate _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
