> Here's another option: make the CPU model smart and when it sees a
> "lock" access have it keep running until it sees an "unlock" access.
> This might not be too bad if "keep running" could be implemented
> simply by doing something like a recursive tail call to tick().

There's already a big loop in the tick() function to simulate a cpu
"width" (so we can set a low CPU frequency, but get a high instruction
rate for rate matching).  I'd rather see something like the for loop
being changed into a while loop, and do a i++ or something like that
to keep it going.

  Nate
_______________________________________________
m5-dev mailing list
m5-dev@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev

Reply via email to