I'm taking a look at this now... I suspect it may be related to my recent thread status changes.
Steve On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Steve Reinhardt <ste...@gmail.com> wrote: > Those tests passed on April 5 and took 395 and 440 seconds on zizzer, > respectively. So (1) they must have broken since then and (2) if they're > taking longer than 10 minutes or so (depending on where you're running them) > they're definitely broken. > > Steve > > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Gabe Black <gbl...@eecs.umich.edu> wrote: > >> All the regressions passed with my changes applied except for tsunami-o3 >> and tsunami-o3-dual. Those had run for 15 hours and not finished when I >> checked on them which is obviously way to long. I removed my patches and >> tried it on the head, but it's been running there for an hour and still >> hasn't finished. I'll leave it running over night just in case, but I >> think those are broken in the head. In light of that, I'm going to wait >> until that gets fixed to do my push, so don't worry about holding off >> any more. >> >> Gabe >> >> Gabriel Michael Black wrote: >> > Quoting Korey Sewell <ksew...@umich.edu>: >> > >> > >> >> Gabe, briefly can you talk about what you're big push is going to be >> on? >> >> >> > >> > It's almost all stuff to get an SMP kernel to boot in x86. There are a >> > couple patches that affect things outside of x86, but I think those >> > are limited to the simple CPU. >> > >> > >> >> I'm really scrambling to get these MIPS fixes in for O3 since a major >> >> culprit of it getting continually broken is the lack of a regression >> >> test. People (including me) can change stuff and unknowingly break >> >> MIPS code. Then, I'm back to fixing what already should be working. >> >> >> >> If possible, give me a day (hopefully will be quick) to finish >> >> cleaning up this MIPS stuff so that I can include that in the testing >> >> of whatever changes you have. Or maybe the changes you have dont >> >> affect this but I'm not sure yet since I dont have the exact fix for >> >> the MIPS code. >> >> >> > >> > I think it's pretty unlikely we'll affect each other, but I'm going to >> > be pushing around 60 patches and I really don't want to have to >> > reverify all those as compared to 5 or 6. My almost up to date patch >> > queue is available from m5sim.org if you want to take a look. You >> > could probably use those patches on your own tree and run your >> > uncommitted regression and I'm betting it will pass. I can hold off if >> > you really, really want me to, but I'd prefer not. >> > >> > Gabe >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > m5-dev mailing list >> > m5-dev@m5sim.org >> > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> m5-dev mailing list >> m5-dev@m5sim.org >> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev >> > >
_______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list m5-dev@m5sim.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
