I've thought about these sorts of hard to reproduce failures before, and thought maybe we should have the regressions periodically dump stats? That way we could tell roughly when something diverged. I don't know if that would actually tell us much, but it would tell us more and sounds to my naive ears like it would be easy to do.
Gabe Korey Sewell wrote: > > The two failures this time are both print the error message "panic: > Tried to read from invalid ipr N" where N is 296 for twolf and 307 for > vortex. > > I was able to pull all the new changesets and run the regressions > successfully just now so I'm a little perplexed to what's going on here. > > Maybe I should log onto zizzer and do some debugging from there. > > Anyway, I'll keep digging. > > > > -- > - Korey > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > m5-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev > _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
