On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Gabe Black <gbl...@eecs.umich.edu> wrote: > > That makes sense and was what I was hoping we could use m5-stable for, > but we didn't end up doing that because we wanted m5-stable to be even > more stable than that (although it tends to just be old, not necessarily > stable). Maybe we need something in the middle that works like you're > suggesting.
I'd prefer to see us just start updating m5-stable more regularly so it can fulfill its original purpose. We keep discussing this but never actually follow through. Steve _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list m5-dev@m5sim.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
