Hi, I have the same problem. You can run the benchmark on desktop to get the correct results. Or you run the benchmark using class memory model In stead of ruby model.
Regards, Zhiguo From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mostafa Mahmoud Hassan Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 9:22 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [gem5-users] GEM5 outputs are not right for PARSEC blackscholes Dear All, I am simulating PARSEC on ALPHA in FS mode followed the instructions available here http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~parsec_m5/<https://mail.eng.cu.edu.eg/owa/redir.aspx?C=838e06d80af04332891850b3e24d1c35&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.cs.utexas.edu%2f%257Eparsec_m5%2f> but I am facing the same problem wdescribed previously on this thread http://www.digipedia.pl/usenet/thread/11777/15880/<https://mail.eng.cu.edu.eg/owa/redir.aspx?C=838e06d80af04332891850b3e24d1c35&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.digipedia.pl%2fusenet%2fthread%2f11777%2f15880%2f> that the output does not match the correct output (anyway, how could you know the correct output ??) I have tried "EXAMPLE" coherence protocol and MESI_CMP_directory Your quick help is appreciated Sincerely, Mostafa
_______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
