Are you saying that the classic memory model gives the right results, but Ruby does not? Which Ruby protocol are you using? It could be that the Alpha LL/SC synchronization operations are not implemented properly in some of the Ruby protocols.
Steve On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 8:00 PM, GE ZHIGUO <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, I have the same problem. **** > > You can run the benchmark on desktop to get the correct results. Or you > run the benchmark using class memory model**** > > In stead of ruby model. **** > > ** ** > > Regards,**** > > Zhiguo**** > > ** ** > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Mostafa Mahmoud Hassan > *Sent:* Monday, September 10, 2012 9:22 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [gem5-users] GEM5 outputs are not right for PARSEC blackscholes > **** > > ** ** > > Dear All, > > I am simulating PARSEC on ALPHA in FS mode followed the instructions > available here > http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~parsec_m5/<https://mail.eng.cu.edu.eg/owa/redir.aspx?C=838e06d80af04332891850b3e24d1c35&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.cs.utexas.edu%2f%257Eparsec_m5%2f> > > but I am facing the same problem wdescribed previously on this thread > http://www.digipedia.pl/usenet/thread/11777/15880/<https://mail.eng.cu.edu.eg/owa/redir.aspx?C=838e06d80af04332891850b3e24d1c35&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.digipedia.pl%2fusenet%2fthread%2f11777%2f15880%2f> > > that the output does not match the correct output (anyway, how could you > know the correct output ??) > > I have tried "EXAMPLE" coherence protocol and MESI_CMP_directory > > > Your quick help is appreciated > > Sincerely, > Mostafa **** > > _______________________________________________ > gem5-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users >
_______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
