Hello Ali thanks again for your effort in helping me, I wasn't able to find
where the address is coming from, where do you think that the problem it can
be?, I am running such an old kernel thanks to the administrator of my
cluster. Have you got any other ideas about what is the problem?. Do you
think that is a problem of my old kernel?. Thanks.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Ali Saidi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why are you running such an old kernel?
>
> Add the O3CPUAll traceflag and start tracing a bit earlier. You should
> figure out where that address is coming from.
> Ali
>
> On Nov 24, 2008, at 8:14 PM, Ryan Markley wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > When I said the kernel in my last mail I said the kernel of the disk
> > image, my kernel is 2.6.9. I have found this problem with the disk
> > image of the web site and the disk image of the PARSEC benchmarks
> > that Joel post several days ago. This is the output that I with the
> > exec flag.
> >
> > 44873185000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+144 : cmpeq
> > r1,37,r1 : IntAl u : D=0x0000000000000001
> > 44873185000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+148 : bne
> > r1,0xfffffc00004bd6e0 : IntAlu :
> > 44873192000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+656 : bis
> > r31,r31,r12 : IntAl u : D=0x0000000000000000
> > 44873192000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+660 : nop (ldq_u
> > r31,0(r30)) : No_OpClass :
> > 44873192000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+664 : nop (bis
> > r31,r31,r31 ) : No_OpClass :
> > 44873192000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+668 : nop (ldq_u
> > r31,0(r30)) : No_OpClass :
> > 44873192000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+672 : lda
> > r18,1(r18) : IntAl u : D=0xfffffc000066dae9
> > 44873192000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+676 : stq
> > r18,96(r30) : MemWr ite : D=0xfffffc000066dae9
> > A=0xfffffc0000c3bd58
> > 44873192000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+680 : ldq_u
> > r2,0(r18) : MemRe ad : D=0x3230253a78343025
> > A=0xfffffc000066dae8
> > 44873192000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+684 : extbl
> > r2,r18,r1 : IntAl u : D=0x0000000000000030
> > 44873193500: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+688 : sll
> > r1,56,r1 : IntAl u : D=0x3000000000000000
> > 44873193500: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+692 : sra
> > r1,56,r2 : IntAl u : D=0x0000000000000030
> > 44873193500: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+696 : lda
> > r2,-32(r2) : IntAl u : D=0x0000000000000010
> > 44873193500: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+700 : zapnot
> > r2,15,r2 : IntAl u : D=0x0000000000000010
> > 44873193500: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+704 : cmpule
> > r2,16,r1 : IntAl u : D=0x0000000000000001
> > 44873193500: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+708 : beq
> > r1,0xfffffc00004bd560 : IntAlu :
> > panic: Unable to find destination for addr (user set default
> > responder): 0x80c4d bc0
> > @ cycle 44873206500
> > [findPort:build/ALPHA_FS/mem/bus.cc, line 334]
> > Memory Usage: 197688 KBytes
> > Program aborted at cycle 44873206500
> > Aborted
> >
> > Thanks for the help.
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Ali Saidi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The Exec traceflag is very useful. You'll see the symbol names for the
> > function that is causing the read to be issued. However, you should
> > only enable tracing right before the error (e.g. --trace-start=
> > 44873106500).
> >
> > Do you encounter the problem with the compiled kernel available on the
> > website?
> >
> > Ali
> >
> > On Nov 24, 2008, at 7:35 PM, Ryan Markley wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Ali thanks again,
> > >
> > > I have been trying several programs and in all of them is the same,
> > > do you think that maybe is a bug of the software for the GCC version
> > > or other libraries?, I did not do any changes to the simulator. My
> > > gcc version is 4.3.2 and my kernel is .6.6.13. I have enable the bus
> > > trace flags and this is the output:
> > >
> > > 44873206500: system.iobus: recvTiming: src 0 dst -1 ReadReq
> > 0x80c4dbc0
> > > panic: Unable to find destination for addr (user set default
> > > responder): 0x80c4dbc0
> > >
> > > I am a beginner in the simulator so can you tell me other trace
> > > flags that I can use to give your more useful information, in
> > > addition how can I do to show the information after a certain number
> > > of cycles?.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Ali Saidi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Ok, now you're going to need to do some debugging. You know what
> > cycle
> > > the panic occurs at, so you should enable some trace flags a few
> > > thousand cycles before that and figure out what the CPU is doing. Is
> > > it accessing a good address? Is there some bug with the address
> > > calculation? Where is the address coming from?
> > >
> > > Have you made any changes to the simulator? What kernel are you
> > > running?
> > >
> > > Ali
> > >
> > >
> > > On Nov 24, 2008, at 5:34 PM, Ryan Markley wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Ali thanks for your answer,
> > > >
> > > > I am using the fs.py that comes with the simulator, when I do the
> > > > simulation with the atomic model works fine, but when I put the --
> > > > detailed options then I get the error that I said before, this is
> > > > the command that I use
> > > >
> > > > ./build/ALPHA_FS/m5.opt -d /temp/output configs/example/fs.py -b
> > > > Hello --detailed --caches
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This is my rcS file.
> > > >
> > > > ---- rcS file
> > > > #!/bin/sh
> > > > /benchmarks/Hello
> > > > m5 exit
> > > >
> > > > This is the output of the file system.terminal
> > > >
> > > > ---- system.terminal file
> > > > Brought up 1 CPUs
> > > > SMP: Total of 1 processors activated (4002.20 BogoMIPS).
> > > > NET: Registered protocol family 16
> > > > EISA bus registered
> > > >
> > > > To run the simulation what I have done is change the benchmarks.py
> > > > file and I have added my own benchmark:
> > > > 'Hello': [SysConfig('Hello.rcS')],
> > > >
> > > > In the file config.ini everything seems fine, any ideas about what
> > > > is happening?. This error happens with every program that I try.
> > If
> > > > you need more information please tell me. Thanks so much.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Ali Saidi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > > Hi Ryan,
> > > >
> > > > We're going to need a lot more information to help you. Please
> > see http://www.m5sim.org/wiki/index.php/Reporting_Problems
> > > > Ali
> > > >
> > > > On Nov 24, 2008, at 3:19 PM, Ryan Markley wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello, I have been running several simulations but I can
> > complete
> > > > > all of them with the atomic cpu but when I put the option of --
> > > > > detailed cpu then I get the following error:
> > > > >
> > > > > panic: Unable to find destination for addr (user set default
> > > > > responder): 0x80c4dbc0
> > > > > @ cycle 44873206500
> > > > > [findPort:build/ALPHA_FS/mem/bus.cc, line 334]
> > > > > Memory Usage: 197528 KBytes
> > > > > Program aborted at cycle 44873206500
> > > > > Aborted
> > > > >
> > > > > With every program I get the same error and in the same cycle, I
> > > > > thought that maybe is a bug so I update to the last development
> > > > > version but I still get the same error. Thank you.
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > m5-users mailing list
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > m5-users mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > m5-users mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > m5-users mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > m5-users mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > m5-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > m5-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> m5-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>
_______________________________________________
m5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
