OK, bad news... looks like the bug is there even in m5-stable. I'm
doing an hg bisect to figure out where it started.
Steve
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Steve Reinhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this with m5 or m5-stable? Assuming it's the former, then we still
> have some debugging to do, but the answer for Ryan may be to stick
> with m5-stable.
>
> If it's the latter, then that's just bad.
>
> Steve
>
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Lisa Hsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I just tried to replicate Ryan's problem - and I did, unfortunately. With
>> Turkey Day coming and travel approaching, I can only look at this
>> sporadically over the next few days, but it appears that something is broken
>> in FS.
>>
>> My repo isn't clean but all my patches shouldn't affect regular FS
>> simulation. Ryan ran ValMemLat and it breaks for me in the same way he
>> described, same with NetperfMaerts.
>>
>> here's the m5term output right before breaking:
>>
>> SMP: Total of 1 processors activated (4002.20 BogoMIPS).
>> NET: Registered protocol family 16
>> EISA bus registered
>>
>> I'll try to take a look over the weekend, but did anyone push anything
>> recently that might break busses/addr range stuff? Oh - my last pull from
>> the main repo was Steve's tracediff stuff, so something happened between
>> that push and the release when we tested everything.
>>
>> Lisa
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Ryan Markley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello again,
>>>
>>> I have installed the simulator in other machine and I still get the
>>> same error also I have run the regression tests and I do not pass the
>>> twosys-tsunami-simple-atomic, this is the complete process that I do
>>> to install the simulator.
>>>
>>> To install the FS mode - scons build/ALPHA_FS/m5.debug
>>>
>>> I Download m5_system_2.0b3.tar.bz2 and I untar it in one of my local
>>> directories in the wiki is done with the sudo command, I cannot do
>>> that because I am not root, is the problem here?.
>>>
>>> After I change syspath.py to point to my local directory where I untar
>>> the disk image.
>>>
>>> And finally I try this command ./build/ALPHA_FS/m5.opt
>>> configs/example/fs.py -b ValMemLat --caches --detailed and I get the
>>> error of unable to find destination for address. Am I doing something
>>> wrong in the installation?.
>>>
>>> Thanks again.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Ryan Markley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi Lisa thank you for your answer, I will try to run the simulator in
>>> > another kenerl and see what happens, this is part of the output that I get
>>> > with exec, I do not know what information it can be relevant, so if you
>>> > can
>>> > tell me something to look at, then I could give you more useful
>>> > information.
>>> >
>>> > This is the output for a hello program:
>>> >
>>> > 44873185000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+128 : extbl r2,r3,r1
>>> > : IntAlu : D=0x00000000 00000025
>>> > 44873185000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+132 : sll r1,56,r1
>>> > : IntAlu : D=0x25000000 00000000
>>> > 44873185000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+136 : sra r1,56,r1
>>> > : IntAlu : D=0x00000000 00000025
>>> > 44873185000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+140 : nop (bis
>>> > r31,r31,r31) : No_OpClass :
>>> > 44873185000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+144 : cmpeq r1,37,r1
>>> > : IntAlu : D=0x00000000 00000001
>>> > 44873185000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+148 : bne
>>> > r1,0xfffffc00004bd6e0 : IntAlu :
>>> > 44873192000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+656 : bis r31,r31,r12
>>> > : IntAlu : D=0x00000000 00000000
>>> > 44873192000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+660 : nop (ldq_u
>>> > r31,0(r30)) : No_OpClass :
>>> > 44873192000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+664 : nop (bis
>>> > r31,r31,r31) : No_OpClass :
>>> > 44873192000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+668 : nop (ldq_u
>>> > r31,0(r30)) : No_OpClass :
>>> > 44873192000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+672 : lda r18,1(r18)
>>> > : IntAlu : D=0xfffffc00 0066dae9
>>> > 44873192000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+676 : stq r18,96(r30)
>>> > : MemWrite : D=0xfffffc 000066dae9
>>> > A=0xfffffc0000c3bd58
>>> > 44873192000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+680 : ldq_u r2,0(r18)
>>> > : MemRead : D=0x3230253 a78343025
>>> > A=0xfffffc000066dae8
>>> > 44873192000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+684 : extbl r2,r18,r1
>>> > : IntAlu : D=0x00000000 00000030
>>> > 44873193500: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+688 : sll r1,56,r1
>>> > : IntAlu : D=0x30000000 00000000
>>> > 44873193500: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+692 : sra r1,56,r2
>>> > : IntAlu : D=0x00000000 00000030
>>> > 44873193500: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+696 : lda r2,-32(r2)
>>> > : IntAlu : D=0x00000000 00000010
>>> > 44873193500: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+700 : zapnot r2,15,r2
>>> > : IntAlu : D=0x00000000 00000010
>>> > 44873193500: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+704 : cmpule r2,16,r1
>>> > : IntAlu : D=0x00000000 00000001
>>> > 44873193500: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+708 : beq
>>> > r1,0xfffffc00004bd560 : IntAlu :
>>> > panic: Unable to find destination for addr (user set default responder):
>>> > 0x80c4dbc0
>>> > @ cycle 44873206500
>>> > [findPort:build/ALPHA_FS/mem/bus.cc, line 334]
>>> > Memory Usage: 197560 KBytes
>>> > Program aborted at cycle 44873206500
>>> > Aborted
>>> >
>>> > This is the output for the ValMemLat benchmark:
>>> >
>>> > 53177309000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+140 : nop (bis
>>> > r31,r31,r31) : No_OpClass :
>>> > 53177309000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+144 : cmpeq r1,37,r1
>>> > : IntAlu : D=0x0000000000000001
>>> > 53177309000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+148 : bne
>>> > r1,0xfffffc00004bd6e0 : IntAlu :
>>> > 53177316000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+656 : bis r31,r31,r12
>>> > : IntAlu : D=0x0000000000000000
>>> > 53177316000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+660 : nop (ldq_u
>>> > r31,0(r30)) : No_OpClass :
>>> > 53177316000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+664 : nop (bis
>>> > r31,r31,r31) : No_OpClass :
>>> > 53177316000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+668 : nop (ldq_u
>>> > r31,0(r30)) : No_OpClass :
>>> > 53177316000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+672 : lda r18,1(r18)
>>> > : IntAlu : D=0xfffffc000066dae9
>>> > 53177316000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+676 : stq r18,96(r30)
>>> > : MemWrite : D=0xfffffc000066dae9 A=0xfffffc00010a3d58
>>> > 53177316000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+680 : ldq_u r2,0(r18)
>>> > : MemRead : D=0x3230253a78343025 A=0xfffffc000066dae8
>>> > 53177316000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+684 : extbl r2,r18,r1
>>> > : IntAlu : D=0x0000000000000030
>>> > 53177317500: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+688 : sll r1,56,r1
>>> > : IntAlu : D=0x3000000000000000
>>> > 53177317500: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+692 : sra r1,56,r2
>>> > : IntAlu : D=0x0000000000000030
>>> > 53177317500: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+696 : lda r2,-32(r2)
>>> > : IntAlu : D=0x0000000000000010
>>> > 53177317500: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+700 : zapnot r2,15,r2
>>> > : IntAlu : D=0x0000000000000010
>>> > 53177317500: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+704 : cmpule r2,16,r1
>>> > : IntAlu : D=0x0000000000000001
>>> > 53177317500: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+708 : beq
>>> > r1,0xfffffc00004bd560 : IntAlu :
>>> > panic: Unable to find destination for addr (user set default responder):
>>> > 0x81017bc0
>>> > @ cycle 53177330500
>>> > [findPort:build/ALPHA_FS/mem/bus.cc, line 334]
>>> > Memory Usage: 590828 KBytes
>>> > Program aborted at cycle 53177330500
>>> > Aborted
>>> >
>>> > For every program I always get the same error It seems that the error
>>> > always come after beq r1,0xfffffc00004bd560.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks again.
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Lisa Hsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> What happens with you turn on the trace flags? It could be a lot of
>>> >> things, just asking "what could it be?" won't get any answers...if you
>>> >> could
>>> >> paste the relevant output from the Exectrace that would help.
>>> >>
>>> >> Also, I thik you mentioned before that it was your native machine
>>> >> running 2.6.9 and your m5 is simulating 2.6.13. that's fine, though you
>>> >> can
>>> >> go newer if you want.
>>> >>
>>> >> Lisa
>>> >>
>>> >> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Ryan Markley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hello Ali thanks again for your effort in helping me, I wasn't able to
>>> >>> find where the address is coming from, where do you think that the
>>> >>> problem
>>> >>> it can be?, I am running such an old kernel thanks to the administrator
>>> >>> of
>>> >>> my cluster. Have you got any other ideas about what is the problem?. Do
>>> >>> you
>>> >>> think that is a problem of my old kernel?. Thanks.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Ali Saidi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Why are you running such an old kernel?
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Add the O3CPUAll traceflag and start tracing a bit earlier. You
>>> >>>> should
>>> >>>> figure out where that address is coming from.
>>> >>>> Ali
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On Nov 24, 2008, at 8:14 PM, Ryan Markley wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> > Hi,
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > When I said the kernel in my last mail I said the kernel of the
>>> >>>> > disk
>>> >>>> > image, my kernel is 2.6.9. I have found this problem with the disk
>>> >>>> > image of the web site and the disk image of the PARSEC benchmarks
>>> >>>> > that Joel post several days ago. This is the output that I with the
>>> >>>> > exec flag.
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > 44873185000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+144 : cmpeq
>>> >>>> > r1,37,r1 : IntAl u : D=0x0000000000000001
>>> >>>> > 44873185000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+148 : bne
>>> >>>> > r1,0xfffffc00004bd6e0 : IntAlu :
>>> >>>> > 44873192000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+656 : bis
>>> >>>> > r31,r31,r12 : IntAl u : D=0x0000000000000000
>>> >>>> > 44873192000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+660 : nop (ldq_u
>>> >>>> > r31,0(r30)) : No_OpClass :
>>> >>>> > 44873192000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+664 : nop (bis
>>> >>>> > r31,r31,r31 ) : No_OpClass :
>>> >>>> > 44873192000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+668 : nop (ldq_u
>>> >>>> > r31,0(r30)) : No_OpClass :
>>> >>>> > 44873192000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+672 : lda
>>> >>>> > r18,1(r18) : IntAl u : D=0xfffffc000066dae9
>>> >>>> > 44873192000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+676 : stq
>>> >>>> > r18,96(r30) : MemWr ite : D=0xfffffc000066dae9
>>> >>>> > A=0xfffffc0000c3bd58
>>> >>>> > 44873192000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+680 : ldq_u
>>> >>>> > r2,0(r18) : MemRe ad : D=0x3230253a78343025
>>> >>>> > A=0xfffffc000066dae8
>>> >>>> > 44873192000: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+684 : extbl
>>> >>>> > r2,r18,r1 : IntAl u : D=0x0000000000000030
>>> >>>> > 44873193500: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+688 : sll
>>> >>>> > r1,56,r1 : IntAl u : D=0x3000000000000000
>>> >>>> > 44873193500: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+692 : sra
>>> >>>> > r1,56,r2 : IntAl u : D=0x0000000000000030
>>> >>>> > 44873193500: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+696 : lda
>>> >>>> > r2,-32(r2) : IntAl u : D=0x0000000000000010
>>> >>>> > 44873193500: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+700 : zapnot
>>> >>>> > r2,15,r2 : IntAl u : D=0x0000000000000010
>>> >>>> > 44873193500: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+704 : cmpule
>>> >>>> > r2,16,r1 : IntAl u : D=0x0000000000000001
>>> >>>> > 44873193500: system.cpu T0 : @vsnprintf+708 : beq
>>> >>>> > r1,0xfffffc00004bd560 : IntAlu :
>>> >>>> > panic: Unable to find destination for addr (user set default
>>> >>>> > responder): 0x80c4d bc0
>>> >>>> > @ cycle 44873206500
>>> >>>> > [findPort:build/ALPHA_FS/mem/bus.cc, line 334]
>>> >>>> > Memory Usage: 197688 KBytes
>>> >>>> > Program aborted at cycle 44873206500
>>> >>>> > Aborted
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > Thanks for the help.
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Ali Saidi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> >>>> > The Exec traceflag is very useful. You'll see the symbol names for
>>> >>>> > the
>>> >>>> > function that is causing the read to be issued. However, you should
>>> >>>> > only enable tracing right before the error (e.g. --trace-start=
>>> >>>> > 44873106500).
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > Do you encounter the problem with the compiled kernel available on
>>> >>>> > the
>>> >>>> > website?
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > Ali
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > On Nov 24, 2008, at 7:35 PM, Ryan Markley wrote:
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > > Hi Ali thanks again,
>>> >>>> > >
>>> >>>> > > I have been trying several programs and in all of them is the
>>> >>>> > > same,
>>> >>>> > > do you think that maybe is a bug of the software for the GCC
>>> >>>> > > version
>>> >>>> > > or other libraries?, I did not do any changes to the simulator.
>>> >>>> > > My
>>> >>>> > > gcc version is 4.3.2 and my kernel is .6.6.13. I have enable the
>>> >>>> > > bus
>>> >>>> > > trace flags and this is the output:
>>> >>>> > >
>>> >>>> > > 44873206500: system.iobus: recvTiming: src 0 dst -1 ReadReq
>>> >>>> > 0x80c4dbc0
>>> >>>> > > panic: Unable to find destination for addr (user set default
>>> >>>> > > responder): 0x80c4dbc0
>>> >>>> > >
>>> >>>> > > I am a beginner in the simulator so can you tell me other trace
>>> >>>> > > flags that I can use to give your more useful information, in
>>> >>>> > > addition how can I do to show the information after a certain
>>> >>>> > > number
>>> >>>> > > of cycles?.
>>> >>>> > >
>>> >>>> > > Thanks.
>>> >>>> > >
>>> >>>> > >
>>> >>>> > >
>>> >>>> > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Ali Saidi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> >>>> > > wrote:
>>> >>>> > > Ok, now you're going to need to do some debugging. You know what
>>> >>>> > cycle
>>> >>>> > > the panic occurs at, so you should enable some trace flags a few
>>> >>>> > > thousand cycles before that and figure out what the CPU is doing.
>>> >>>> > > Is
>>> >>>> > > it accessing a good address? Is there some bug with the address
>>> >>>> > > calculation? Where is the address coming from?
>>> >>>> > >
>>> >>>> > > Have you made any changes to the simulator? What kernel are you
>>> >>>> > > running?
>>> >>>> > >
>>> >>>> > > Ali
>>> >>>> > >
>>> >>>> > >
>>> >>>> > > On Nov 24, 2008, at 5:34 PM, Ryan Markley wrote:
>>> >>>> > >
>>> >>>> > > > Hi Ali thanks for your answer,
>>> >>>> > > >
>>> >>>> > > > I am using the fs.py that comes with the simulator, when I do
>>> >>>> > > > the
>>> >>>> > > > simulation with the atomic model works fine, but when I put the
>>> >>>> > > > --
>>> >>>> > > > detailed options then I get the error that I said before, this
>>> >>>> > > > is
>>> >>>> > > > the command that I use
>>> >>>> > > >
>>> >>>> > > > ./build/ALPHA_FS/m5.opt -d /temp/output configs/example/fs.py
>>> >>>> > > > -b
>>> >>>> > > > Hello --detailed --caches
>>> >>>> > > >
>>> >>>> > > >
>>> >>>> > > > This is my rcS file.
>>> >>>> > > >
>>> >>>> > > > ---- rcS file
>>> >>>> > > > #!/bin/sh
>>> >>>> > > > /benchmarks/Hello
>>> >>>> > > > m5 exit
>>> >>>> > > >
>>> >>>> > > > This is the output of the file system.terminal
>>> >>>> > > >
>>> >>>> > > > ---- system.terminal file
>>> >>>> > > > Brought up 1 CPUs
>>> >>>> > > > SMP: Total of 1 processors activated (4002.20 BogoMIPS).
>>> >>>> > > > NET: Registered protocol family 16
>>> >>>> > > > EISA bus registered
>>> >>>> > > >
>>> >>>> > > > To run the simulation what I have done is change the
>>> >>>> > > > benchmarks.py
>>> >>>> > > > file and I have added my own benchmark:
>>> >>>> > > > 'Hello': [SysConfig('Hello.rcS')],
>>> >>>> > > >
>>> >>>> > > > In the file config.ini everything seems fine, any ideas about
>>> >>>> > > > what
>>> >>>> > > > is happening?. This error happens with every program that I
>>> >>>> > > > try.
>>> >>>> > If
>>> >>>> > > > you need more information please tell me. Thanks so much.
>>> >>>> > > >
>>> >>>> > > >
>>> >>>> > > >
>>> >>>> > > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Ali Saidi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> >>>> > wrote:
>>> >>>> > > > Hi Ryan,
>>> >>>> > > >
>>> >>>> > > > We're going to need a lot more information to help you. Please
>>> >>>> > see http://www.m5sim.org/wiki/index.php/Reporting_Problems
>>> >>>> > > > Ali
>>> >>>> > > >
>>> >>>> > > > On Nov 24, 2008, at 3:19 PM, Ryan Markley wrote:
>>> >>>> > > >
>>> >>>> > > > > Hello, I have been running several simulations but I can
>>> >>>> > complete
>>> >>>> > > > > all of them with the atomic cpu but when I put the option of
>>> >>>> > > > > --
>>> >>>> > > > > detailed cpu then I get the following error:
>>> >>>> > > > >
>>> >>>> > > > > panic: Unable to find destination for addr (user set default
>>> >>>> > > > > responder): 0x80c4dbc0
>>> >>>> > > > > @ cycle 44873206500
>>> >>>> > > > > [findPort:build/ALPHA_FS/mem/bus.cc, line 334]
>>> >>>> > > > > Memory Usage: 197528 KBytes
>>> >>>> > > > > Program aborted at cycle 44873206500
>>> >>>> > > > > Aborted
>>> >>>> > > > >
>>> >>>> > > > > With every program I get the same error and in the same
>>> >>>> > > > > cycle, I
>>> >>>> > > > > thought that maybe is a bug so I update to the last
>>> >>>> > > > > development
>>> >>>> > > > > version but I still get the same error. Thank you.
>>> >>>> > > > > _______________________________________________
>>> >>>> > > > > m5-users mailing list
>>> >>>> > > > > [email protected]
>>> >>>> > > > > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>>> >>>> > > >
>>> >>>> > > > _______________________________________________
>>> >>>> > > > m5-users mailing list
>>> >>>> > > > [email protected]
>>> >>>> > > > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>>> >>>> > > >
>>> >>>> > > > _______________________________________________
>>> >>>> > > > m5-users mailing list
>>> >>>> > > > [email protected]
>>> >>>> > > > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>>> >>>> > >
>>> >>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>> >>>> > > m5-users mailing list
>>> >>>> > > [email protected]
>>> >>>> > > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>>> >>>> > >
>>> >>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>> >>>> > > m5-users mailing list
>>> >>>> > > [email protected]
>>> >>>> > > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> >>>> > m5-users mailing list
>>> >>>> > [email protected]
>>> >>>> > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> >>>> > m5-users mailing list
>>> >>>> > [email protected]
>>> >>>> > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>>> m5-users mailing list
>>> >>>> [email protected]
>>> >>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>> m5-users mailing list
>>> >>> [email protected]
>>> >>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> m5-users mailing list
>>> >> [email protected]
>>> >> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>>> >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> m5-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> m5-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>>
>
_______________________________________________
m5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
