Did you run one splash program to the end (with multiple threads on
multi-core, say 4 threads on 4-core)? This is feasible under ALPHA_SE, using
the information provided by the link. If so, you should observe stats for
different cores.

On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:25 PM, biswabandan panda <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> thanks lida for help,but i am still getting those zeros,
> please suggest me something.thanks
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 1:40 AM, Lide Duan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> http://www.m5sim.org/wiki/index.php/Splash_benchmarks
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 2:26 PM, biswabandan panda 
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> hi lide,
>>>            i am using those binaries only,can you tell me which one
>>> should i use and  from where i can get it?is ther any other
>>> alternative.thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Lide Duan <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> If you ran splash from the very beginning, the reason that only one core
>>>> had stats could be your simulation was not long enough to get to the
>>>> parallel phase. M5 will randomly but deterministically pick one of the 
>>>> cores
>>>> to do the serial initialization. If you are using the pre-compiled splash
>>>> binaries from M5 website (which can be only used under ALPHA_SE), the 
>>>> serial
>>>> initial phase can have several million to hundred million of instructions,
>>>> varying from program to program.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:58 PM, biswabandan panda <[email protected]
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> thanks a lot Gabe,can you just do me afavour asking this question,i
>>>>> mailed to lot of m5 users even if in mailing list,why i am not getting 
>>>>> stats
>>>>> of all cores when i am using splash,i am getting zeros for all the cores
>>>>> except1,please sir,what to do to get the stats in all the cores.thanks 
>>>>> again
>>>>> for your time u spent for me
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:07 AM, Gabe Black <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> You should try using the most recent code from the development
>>>>>> repository. It seems to work for me on that version. Did you change
>>>>>> your
>>>>>> command line? You'll find information about checking out the latest
>>>>>> code
>>>>>> here http://www.m5sim.org/wiki/index.php/Repository. There's
>>>>>> currently a
>>>>>> compilation bug for X86_FS I'm waiting to check a fix in for, but if
>>>>>> you
>>>>>> don't use that it won't affect you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gabe
>>>>>>
>>>>>> biswabandan panda wrote:
>>>>>> > Thanks,
>>>>>> >             i have commented that line,then i got,
>>>>>> >           Global frequency set at 1000000000000 ticks per second
>>>>>> > 0: system.remote_gdb.listener: listening for remote gdb #0 on port
>>>>>> 7016
>>>>>> > 0: system.remote_gdb.listener: listening for remote gdb #1 on port
>>>>>> 7017
>>>>>> > 0: system.remote_gdb.listener: listening for remote gdb #2 on port
>>>>>> 7018
>>>>>> > 0: system.remote_gdb.listener: listening for remote gdb #3 on port
>>>>>> 7019
>>>>>> > Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>>> >   File "<string>", line 1, in <module>
>>>>>> >   File "/home/rajitha/Desktop/m5/src/python/m5/main.py", line 359,
>>>>>> in main
>>>>>> >   File "configs/splash2/run.py", line 256, in <module>
>>>>>> >     m5.instantiate(root)
>>>>>> >   File "/home/rajitha/Desktop/m5/src/python/m5/simulate.py", line
>>>>>> 92,
>>>>>> > in instantiate
>>>>>> > TypeError: in method 'getCheckpoint', argument 1 of type
>>>>>> 'std::string
>>>>>> > const &'
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > can you suggest something for this?i have tried to fix it,and i am
>>>>>> trying,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Gabe Black <[email protected]
>>>>>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >     I'll have to defer to Nate for an expert opinion, but I think
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> >     is a
>>>>>> >     bug in the splash2/run.py script. The problem code is here:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >     for cpu in cpus:
>>>>>> >        cpu.addPrivateSplitL1Caches(L1(size = options.l1size, assoc =
>>>>>> 1),
>>>>>> >                                    L1(size = options.l1size, assoc =
>>>>>> 4))
>>>>>> >        cpu.mem = cpu.dcache
>>>>>> >        # connect cpu level-1 caches to shared level-2 cache
>>>>>> >        cpu.connectMemPorts(system.toL2bus)
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >     The addPrivateSplitL1Caches function is the following.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >        def addPrivateSplitL1Caches(self, ic, dc):
>>>>>> >            assert(len(self._mem_ports) < 6)
>>>>>> >            self.icache = ic
>>>>>> >            self.dcache = dc
>>>>>> >            self.icache_port = ic.cpu_side
>>>>>> >            self.dcache_port = dc.cpu_side
>>>>>> >            self._mem_ports = ['icache.mem_side', 'dcache.mem_side']
>>>>>> >            if buildEnv['FULL_SYSTEM']:
>>>>>> >                if buildEnv['TARGET_ISA'] in ['x86', 'arm']:
>>>>>> >                    self._mem_ports += ["itb.walker.port",
>>>>>> >     "dtb.walker.port"]
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >     What I think is happening is that the code in
>>>>>> >     addPrivateSplitL1Caches is
>>>>>> >     assigning the dc parameter to a member of self (the cpu),
>>>>>> implicitly
>>>>>> >     attaching that dcache as a child object. Then, on the second
>>>>>> line
>>>>>> >     of the
>>>>>> >     for loop in the first blob of code (cpu.mem = cpu.dcache) the
>>>>>> code
>>>>>> >     attempts to assign dcache to another member of cpu, making cpu
>>>>>> its
>>>>>> >     parent twice. The SimObject python class gets upset about that
>>>>>> because
>>>>>> >     by setting up the parent of a simobject that already has one,
>>>>>> you'll
>>>>>> >     lose track of the original. I grepped through the code and
>>>>>> >     couldn't see
>>>>>> >     anywhere the "mem" parameter of the cpu object was actually
>>>>>> used,
>>>>>> >     so it
>>>>>> >     might fix it to just comment that line out. I tried that, and
>>>>>> after
>>>>>> >     fixing your -b parameter (it should be FMM, not FFM) things
>>>>>> seemed
>>>>>> >     to work.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >     Gabe
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >     biswabandan panda wrote:
>>>>>> >     > hi all,
>>>>>> >     >          i have tried to run splash2 in beta 6 version
>>>>>> >     >
>>>>>> >     > this is my command:
>>>>>> >     > command line: build/ALPHA_SE/m5.debug configs/splash2/run.py
>>>>>> >     --rootdir
>>>>>> >     > splash/splash2/codes -t --frequency 1GHz -n 4 --l1size 64kB
>>>>>> --l2size
>>>>>> >     > 256kB --l1latency 4ns --l2latency 11ns -b FFM
>>>>>> >     >
>>>>>> >     > these are the errors i got:
>>>>>> >     >
>>>>>> >     > Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>>> >     >   File "<string>", line 1, in <module>
>>>>>> >     >   File "/home/rajitha/Desktop/m5/src/python/m5/main.py", line
>>>>>> >     359, in main
>>>>>> >     >   File "configs/splash2/run.py", line 197, in <module>
>>>>>> >     >     cpu.mem = cpu.dcache
>>>>>> >     >   File "/home/rajitha/Desktop/m5/src/python/m5/SimObject.py",
>>>>>> line
>>>>>> >     > 621, in __setattr__
>>>>>> >     >   File "/home/rajitha/Desktop/m5/src/python/m5/SimObject.py",
>>>>>> line
>>>>>> >     > 667, in add_child
>>>>>> >     > RuntimeError: add_child('mem'): child 'dcache' already has
>>>>>> parent
>>>>>> >     > '(orphan).cpu0'
>>>>>> >     >
>>>>>> >     > BTW i was able to run it fine in older versions,but in beta6
>>>>>> >     these are
>>>>>> >     > the errors.any kind of help is welcome.
>>>>>> >     >
>>>>>> >     > thanks
>>>>>> >     > biswa
>>>>>> >     >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> >     >
>>>>>> >     > _______________________________________________
>>>>>> >     > m5-users mailing list
>>>>>> >     > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>> >     > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >     _______________________________________________
>>>>>> >     m5-users mailing list
>>>>>> >     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>> >     http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>>> > m5-users mailing list
>>>>>> > [email protected]
>>>>>> > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> m5-users mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> m5-users mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> m5-users mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> m5-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> m5-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> m5-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>
_______________________________________________
m5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users

Reply via email to