Robert is correct - the I-D checklist does require such a section
in every draft. Otherwise IANA has to peruse each draft looking for
work to do.
Since the proposed new section actually has content, the editor may
decide to leave it. You might check the proposed section title ;-)
Brian
Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 23:08:24 -0500, Robert Sparks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
It's my understanding that IANA prefers explicit notification that
they have nothing to do
(see http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html section 7D). Sections like
this are then removed
by the RFC Editor.
New text:
<section title="Security Considerations">
<t>
There are no IANA actions required. The TCP-MD5
option number is defined in
<xref target='RFC2385'/>, and is currently
listed by IANA.
</t>
</section>
--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
