Yeah. I have to agree with James and Brian: in retrospect, the M/O bits are useless and further discussion at this point is even more useless.
- Ralph On 11/29/06 4:58 AM, "Brian E Carpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The M&O bits were >> defined long before we had DHCPv6 in place. > > And they were discussed to death in the WG before the draft reached > WG consensus. I'm not inclined to reopen that discussion. > > (Somebody added ietf@ietf.org to this thread. I have removed it.) > > Brian _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
