> - 2 page 3: the way STD 58 is referenced is inelegant (but it seems the > issue is more in the STD 58 covering multiple RFCs...)
This is copied from the MIB boilerplate; see http://www.ops.ietf.org/mib-boilerplate.html The awkward references have come up a few times, but it's not appropriate to change them in a given document - you just copy the boilerplate into your document. Bill _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art