I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-enum-xmpp-01.txt
Reviewer: Miguel Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Review Date: 2007-04-30
IETF LC End Date: 2007-05-10
Summary: The document is basically ready for publication as a Proposed
Standard.
Comments:
1) The document should be a bit more clear on which registry IANA has to
operate on. In particular, Section 8 does not mention the "Enumservice
Registrations" registry (which is the proper name). Suggestion: modify
the first paragraph in Section 8 to read:
This memo requests IANA to add a new "XMPP" Enumervice to the
Enumservice Registrations registry, according to the definitions in this
document and RFC 3761 [1].
2) I find a bit weird that references 2 (E.164) and 7 (XMPP) are
normative. I think a reader don't need to understand E.164 or XMPP to
implement this specification. As long as the reader understand ENUM, and
the XMPP URI/IRI, it is sufficient from an implementation point of view.
So in my opinion these references are informative.
BR,
Miguel Garcia
--
Please note my new e-mail address: miguel.garcia at nsn.com
Miguel A. Garcia tel:+358-50-4804586
Nokia Siemens Networks Helsinki, Finland
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
