I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-rtgwg-rfc3682bis-09.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 2007/06/10 IETF LC End Date: 2007/06/15 IESG Telechat date: not known Summary: Almost Ready Comments: I have only one major comment: the document does not explain it is a revision of RFC 3682, I propose to add a sentence at the beginning of the introduction stating that with a reference. Other points (minor/editorial/for the RFC editor): - 2 page 4 in: "The possibility of denial-of-service (DoS) attack prevention, however, is based on the assumption that packet classification and separation of their paths is done before they go through a scarce resource in the system." two proposals: "is" -> "are" and "packet classification" -> "classification of (the?) packets" - 2.2 page 5: (i.e., trusted) -> (i.e., are trusted) - 5.1 page 7: hasn't -> has not - 5.5 page 12: multi-hop -> multi-hop case - 6.1 page 12: add a reference for RFC 3682 here (in fact, everywhere at the exception of the abstract). - A page 14: I can't parse "within "TrustRadius" (e.g., 1) of 255 instead of 255" Regards [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
