Hi Ben,
Thanks for your feedback. There are two open issues left in this email:
open item concerning privacy implications and the clarification around
requirements/ numbering. Let me address the second one here.
Your initial comment was:
This document states a number of requirements that might be referenced
by future documents. If there is any intent that other document be
evaluated for compliance with the requirements herein, it would be
useful to break such requirements out and number or otherwise label them
so they can be easily referenced in other documents.
This document states a number of requirements that might be
referenced by future documents.
Could you please give us an example.
Pretty much every bullet item in section 4 and its subsections.
I understand what you mean now.
Our goal with the section 4 is the explanation of the requirements on
which the architecture is based. In other words, a kind of introduction
of what was important in terms of sampling/filtering/hashing. So we
don't foresee that those requirements might be referenced by another
document or protocol. As a consequence, we're not sure that numbering
the requirements would help.
Regards, Benoit.
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
