okay, reasonable enough. While it is jargon, I think it is accepted in the computer science space...
Thanks, Lou On 9/29/2009 6:10 PM, Francis Dupont wrote: > In your previous mail you wrote: > > => oops, catching an old message. > > > - 2.2 page 6 and 2.3 page 6: conformant -> compliant > > Why? > > => just because conformant is not in my dictionary, compliant is > and is supposed to mean the same thing... Now my dictionary is > not universal and is British oriented (:-). > > Regards > > francis.dup...@fdupont.fr > > > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
