Enrico - thanks for your review. As one of the document editors, I have a comment and question inline:
On Jun 21, 2010, at 8:48 AM, Enrico Marocco wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-sipcore-invfix-01 > Reviewer: Enrico Marocco > Review Date: 2010-06-21 > IETF LC End Date: 2010-06-22 > > Summary: Ready with very minor nits. > > > Major issues: none. > > > Minor issues: none. > > > Nits/editorial comments: > > "User Agent" is defined in S. 3., second paragraph with the > parenthesized expansion following the acronym. This is not consistent > with the previous definition of "SIP," in S. 2. Since the term "user > agent" already appears a few lines above, I'd suggest to define the > acronym there, in the usual form. I agree that the acronym expansion is better done somewhere else in this case, mostly because the string "UA core" needs to be searchable in this document. > > Same as above for "Transaction User" in S. 7.1., second paragraph. This one I don't understand. What's the inconsistency you're seeing here? > > > Note: As already pointed out by IANA, the "IANA Considerations" section > should update the "Method and Response Codes" registry in the parts > concerning the INVITE method. yes. > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
