>> Robert Sparks wrote: >> Same as above for "Transaction User" in S. 7.1., second paragraph. > This one I don't understand. What's the inconsistency you're seeing > here?
My suggestion was to do the expansion in the usual way, IOW s/TU (Transaction User)/Transaction User (TU)/. However, since TU is a well known element defined and described in 3261, I see the point of expanding it the way you did. -- Ciao, Enrico Sent from my iPhone Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
