Hello, Sigge. You can integrate the comments in your next revision. I don't think my comments will hold up publication. I am happy to review again once you have updated the draft.
Thank you, Kathleen -----Original Message----- From: Sigfrid Lundberg [mailto:s...@kb.dk] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 9:30 AM To: Moriarty, Kathleen Cc: mary.ietf.bar...@gmail.com; laurent.rom...@inria.fr; draft-lundberg-app-tei-xml....@tools.ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org; alexey.melni...@isode.com Subject: SV: [Gen-ART] Gen-ART review of draft-lundberg-app-tei-xml-03 Thanks Kathleen for these comments! They are helpful and we will revise the draft accordingly. Should we do this _now_? Will there come more comments later on after the end of the last call? Please give us a hint on the procedures. Yours, Sigge ________________________________________ Fra: kathleen.moria...@emc.com [kathleen.moria...@emc.com] Sendt: 13. september 2010 20:40 Til: laurent.rom...@inria.fr; Sigfrid Lundberg; gen-art@ietf.org; draft-lundberg-app-tei-xml....@tools.ietf.org Cc: mary.ietf.bar...@gmail.com Emne: [Gen-ART] Gen-ART review of draft-lundberg-app-tei-xml-03 I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-lundberg-app-tei-xml-03 Reviewer: Kathleen M. Moriarty Review Date: 13 September 2010 IETF LC End Date: IESG Telechat date: (if known) Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be fixed before publication. The nits are included below that should be resolved. Additionally, the document is light on descriptions prior to some sections, which may not be necessary for those well-versed in this space (section 2). Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: 1. TEI acronym should be included in the Introduction (which ever is appropriate: Text Encoding Initiative(TEI) or Text Encoding Interchange (TEI)? 2. Section 5.2: The following sentence context shifts, so it may be better if rewritten "Some parts of a document may be free, whereas other parts, such as editorial text and annotations may be written much later may hence be subject to DRM restrictions." to: Some parts of a document may be unrestricted, whereas other parts, such as editorial text and annotations may be subject to DRM restrictions. The editorial text and annotations may not be written at the same time as the rest of the document. Since DRM may be copyrighted, have record retention requirements, or security requirements, I would change 'free' to unrestricted. 3. Section 5.2: Consider changing the term "intellectual honesty" to "intellectual property attribution" as I don't think it is a common term. " Even when there are no IPR constraints, intellectual honesty alone requires that document users are able to tell the difference between content from different sources." 4. Section 5.3: The following sentence needs to be reworked a bit: " Similarly, historical documents may in part their entirety be confidential." to: "Similarly, historical documents may in part or in their entirety be confidential." 5. Section 5.3: Since other conditions may be possible, I recommend changing the following sentence: " This may be required by law or by the terms and conditions of a donation." to: "This may be required by law or by the terms and conditions such as in the case of a donation." 6. Section 5.3: Change "need" to "needs" or insert a word like "MAY" or change to "SHALL require" in the following sentence: "A text archive need content filtering or cryptographic technologies to meet such requirements." Kathleen M. Moriarty, CISSP | Practice Manager | Information Security and Risk Management| EMC Consulting _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
