Hi Thomas,
Yes, these are comments for your consideration, not strict requirements.
Please follow your intuition and your chairs' and AD's advice.
BR,
Miguel
On 19/05/2011 16:22, Thomas Morin wrote:
Hi Miguel,
Miguel A. Garcia:
- The document has a strange structure. In particular, Section 1 lists
the contributing authors, which usually are included at the end of the
document. I recommend you to take a look at the Instructions to
Authors, in particular look at Section 4, which describes the Sections
in an RFC and their order:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-editor/instructions2authors.txt
where the Contributors are listed in section 7a, i.e., right after the
main body of the document, and prior to Acknowledgments, Security
Considerations, and IANA Considerations.
As I understand these are general, rather than strict, guidelines.
The choice was made to compensate from removing most of the authors from
the frontpage on which they were on previous revisions of the document,
and still keep them appearing close to the start of the document. Unless
this is problematic, I'd prefer to keep it as is.
Notice that you document has the Acknowledgments and Security
Considerations reversed as well.
Good catch.
- Section 2.2, small typo
s/A LSP/An LSP
s/A LSR/An LSR
Good catch too.
Thanks you,
-Thomas
--
Miguel A. Garcia
+34-91-339-3608
Ericsson Spain
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
