Returning to this topic. Several ADs have requested more time to do the review for this document (including myself). There will be more than a month until the approval telechat.
I will attempt to do a review (of at least the changed parts). But this will probably be a partial review either in terms of what parts I can review (hopefully different than you you Martin T). In the interest of sharing workload and attempting to cover a bigger part of the overall document, do you think it would be possible to find an additional pair of eyes to look at it? If we did, then Martin, me, and the new person would have all three have looked at this, and maybe that would be enough to assure that no glaring problems are left. I know I am asking a lot, and this would essentially have to be someone volunteering to take it on. Thoughts? Anyone willing to do a partial review? Jari ----Martin Stiemerling's mail------ Dear all, I have moved the two NFSv4 drafts out of the agenda of the 04/25 telechat, upon request of Jari, I also can see very good reasons to give time to address the review comments so far. The next telechat in May for me is 5/30, as I am on holidays on 5/16. However, I would be pleased if anybody of you who has already read the draft and has comments or discusses to raise them already by now. The ballots are just out this afternoon. Thank you, Martin _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
