I will volunteer. I drew what must be close to the shortest draft on record this month in the normal lottery!
Regards, Elwyn On Sat, 2013-04-20 at 00:40 +0300, Jari Arkko wrote: > Returning to this topic. Several ADs have requested more time to do the > review for this document (including myself). There will be more than a month > until the approval telechat. > > I will attempt to do a review (of at least the changed parts). But this will > probably be a partial review either in terms of what parts I can review > (hopefully different than you you Martin T). In the interest of sharing > workload and attempting to cover a bigger part of the overall document, do > you think it would be possible to find an additional pair of eyes to look at > it? If we did, then Martin, me, and the new person would have all three have > looked at this, and maybe that would be enough to assure that no glaring > problems are left. > > I know I am asking a lot, and this would essentially have to be someone > volunteering to take it on. Thoughts? Anyone willing to do a partial review? > > Jari > > ----Martin Stiemerling's mail------ > > Dear all, > > I have moved the two NFSv4 drafts out of the agenda of the 04/25 telechat, > upon request of Jari, > I also can see very good reasons to give time to address the review comments > so far. > > The next telechat in May for me is 5/30, as I am on holidays on 5/16. > > However, I would be pleased if anybody of you who has already read the draft > and has comments or discusses to raise them already by now. The ballots are > just out this afternoon. > > Thank you, > > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
