Thanks for your review, Dan. I have balloted a No Objection based on this. Jari
On May 13, 2013, at 1:30 PM, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <droma...@avaya.com> wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at > > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may > receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks-04 > Reviewer: Dan Romascanu > Review Date: 5/13/13 > IETF LC End Date: 5/20/13 > IESG Telechat date: > > Summary: > > This document is Ready. It is clearly written and easy to follow, even for a > non-expert in security. I appreciated the sections that describe the > transition to implementations that support the update and the ones that > describe behavior upon test failures - which are of value to implementers and > operators. One minor issue related to the IANA registry may be only an issue > of clarification. > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > > The IANA Considerations Sections mention that Groups 27-30 have been recently > defined in [I-D.merkle-ikev2-ke-brainpool]. This is an Informational > Reference which is somehow odd, because without this reference the IANA > actions could not be completed. On the other hand making > [I-D.merkle-ikev2-ke-brainpool] Normative Reference would create a downref > because the later is informational. I believe this is OK, because I see the > document in RFC Editor Queue waiting for IANA actions, which may actually be > exactly the ones described in this I-D, but a cleaner solution would have > been not defining at all Groups 27-30 here. > > Nits/editorial comments: > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
