Francis, Thank you for the review. I have made all three changes in my working version that will become the -04.
Merci, --David > -----Original Message----- > From: gen-art-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:gen-art-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Francis Dupont > Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 4:45 AM > To: gen-art@ietf.org > Cc: draft-ietf-storm-ipsec-ips-update....@tools.ietf.org > Subject: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-storm-ipsec-ips-update-03.txt > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-storm-ipsec-ips-update-03.txt > Reviewer: Francis Dupont > Review Date: 2013-08-14 > IETF LC End Date: 2013-08-19 > IESG Telechat date: unknown > > Summary: Almost ready > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: > - this is in fact a pure editorial concern but as it can have a big impact > on not IETF expert readers I put it here: > At the end of 3 page 9: > use of IPsec v3 is recommended -> use of IPsec v3 is RECOMMENDED > Two notes for the discussion: > - a RFC 2119 keyword doesn't need to be capitalized > - it is the only place with a preference for IPsec v3 over v2. > > Nits/editorial comments: > - Authors' Addresses page 16 (twice): US -> USA > > Regards > > francis.dup...@fdupont.fr > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
