Francis: Thank you for your review. I have balloted a no-obj position for this document.
Jari On Oct 3, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Ali C. Begen (abegen) <abe...@cisco.com> wrote: > hi Francis > > Thanks for the review. The first nit, yes, i think I missed the one preferred > by the RFC editor (this will be fixed by them anyway). The second one, ABNFs > are not exactly figures, but in one of my earlier RFCs, someone asked for a > caption for it and that is why I have been putting them as figures. If the > editor has a better way of doing it, they will fix it anyway. > > So, at this point, to minimize confusion due to versioning, etc., I'd like to > defer these changes to the editing phase. > > Thanks, > -acbegen > > > On Oct 2, 2013, at 2:11 PM, Francis Dupont <francis.dup...@fdupont.fr> wrote: > >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at >> >> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >> >> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments >> you may receive. >> >> Document: draft-ietf-mmusic-delayed-duplication-02.txt >> Reviewer: Francis Dupont >> Review Date: 20130925 >> IETF LC End Date: 20130924 >> IESG Telechat date: unknown >> >> Summary: Ready >> >> Major issues: None >> >> Minor issues: None >> >> Nits/editorial comments: >> - ToC page 2 and 7 page 7: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments >> >> - 3 page 4: "Figure 1" (which should be in the same page than the "figure") >> is not a figure... >> >> Regards >> >> francis.dup...@fdupont.fr > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
